Quantcast
Channel: Data converters forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all 5988 articles
Browse latest View live

LM98640 Digital I/O Voltage

$
0
0

I am working on a circuit board using LM98640 to interface an FPGA.  The datasheet specifies digital supply voltage of 1.8V, but Electrical Characteristics table shows that VIH and VOH min is 2.0V and 1.8V, respectively.  Based on the Electrical Characteristics table, the I/O voltage (digital) can't be 1.8V.  I suspect it should be 3.3V, but I guess my question is: what FPGA I/Os (1.8V or 3.3V) should the LM98640 interface to?

Thanks in advance for any insight/clarification.

-Simon


Recovering AFE channel compression

$
0
0

Hi folks,

I'm working on a design with an AFE module where I'll be taking advantage of channel compression so that I'll have multiple channels multiplexed onto a single LVDS lane. I'll also be using the decimation feature such that the device will have several clock cycles of output between samples. 

One sample from each channel will be sequentially output on the single LVDS lane followed by several clock cycles of zeros. Then, when the next sample is available, again, one word from each channel will be multiplexed onto the lane followed by zeros. This repeats until we're done sampling.

If I'm not mistaken, I believe the DCLK and FCLK continue to run between samples. 

Looking at this from the FPGA side where I'll be deserializing the samples, is there a preferred way to associate a sample with a channel? 

For example, do I simply count the number of frame cycles to identify what byte is associated with each channel, or is there some kind of reference signal that channel 1 is now being output?

Thanks for any advice,

Matt

TLV990: Minimum Input ADCCLK frequency

$
0
0

Hi all,

Could you tell me the minimum input ADCCLK frequency of TLV990?
My customer plans to use this device at 4MHz.

Regards,
Toshi

code for ultrasound evaluation board

$
0
0

Hello TI support,

This is Parisa. We bought the TX-SDK-V2 evaluation board for ultrasound transmitter in order to do some measurement. In this level we need to program the Opal Kelly EXM3001 FPGA Module. would you send me the relevant code to be used for programming FPGA in order to transmit data?

Regards,

Parisa

TI Ultradsound Transmit Solutions\ Opal Kelly \ TX_SDK_V1

$
0
0

I have built the Ultrsound transmit solutions( refence to http://www.ti.com/tool/TX-SDK-V1Need I configure the Opal Kelly's FPGA to make the lm96570 of the TX_SDK_V1 firing signal?Or the GUI (TI Ultrasound Tools)of the TX_SDK_V1 could do this by itself?

TLV990-13: specifications

$
0
0

Hi all,
Could you please share the data of following specifications?

1. About INL and DNL, will the linearity is changed by the value of the PGA?
2. About CDS full-scale input span, is it range of a video signal between GND and offset level like case 2? 
    

     

3. Is there the timing chart and time value for CLCCD, BLKG, OBCLP and ADCCLK?

Regards,
Toshi

VSP5610 Application schematic

$
0
0

Hi 

Can you share the application schematic for VSP5610 between FPGA & CCD Camera/

REgards

Aji

Ultrasound Analog Front End With 204B interface

$
0
0

Dear Sir,

Do you have Ultrasound Analog Front End With 204B interface product?


AFE5816: Frequency of ADC_CLK and FCLK

$
0
0

Hi all,

According to the datasheet of AFE5816, FCLK is the same frequency with ADC_CLK.
However my customer reported that the FCLK is a half of ADC_CLK,
and 12bit length of the data to be output are accommodated in one cycle of the FCLK.
It seems that the ADC sampling rate is a half of ADC_CLK.

Is there any divider function for ADC_CLK input?

ADC_CLK:

FCLK:

Regards,
Toshi

AF5809 Coefficient SPI Programming

$
0
0

Hi,

I'm having trouble configuring the AFE5809 decimation filter.

I'm using the following coefficients take from a previous post for say decimation by 8 filter

uint8 pu8_fircoeff_DEC8[8 * 14]={
0x0F,0xEF,0xFC,0x60,0x06,0xBF,0xF1,0x00,0x23,0xFF,0xC0,0x00,0xBF,0xFF,
0x0F,0x1B,0xF6,0xF0,0x11,0xBF,0xD9,0x00,0x5B,0xFF,0x50,0x01,0x7F,0xFD,
0x0D,0x8B,0xF3,0xE0,0x18,0x3F,0xCA,0x00,0x7B,0xFF,0x00,0x01,0xFF,0xFD,
0x0B,0x5F,0xF3,0x10,0x1A,0x7F,0xC5,0x00,0x87,0xFE,0xF0,0x02,0x3F,0xFC,
0x08,0xCF,0xF4,0x50,0x18,0xBF,0xC9,0x00,0x7B,0xFF,0x10,0x01,0xFF,0xFC,
0x06,0x13,0xF6,0xF0,0x13,0x7F,0xD4,0x00,0x63,0xFF,0x40,0x01,0x7F,0xFD,
0x03,0x6B,0xFA,0x70,0x0C,0x3F,0xE5,0x00,0x3F,0xFF,0x90,0x00,0xFF,0xFE,
0x01,0x0B,0xFE,0x30,0x04,0x3F,0xF7,0x00,0x17,0xFF,0xE0,0x00,0x7F,0xFF} ;

SLOS738E section 8.6.2.1.3 advises to first write to 0xC6[7:0] with base address, which I have assumed is 0x0000.

It then advises to write 112bits to SPI address 0xC7, MSB first, although its not clear how these bytes are to be written.

i.e. does one convert each 14 byte row to MSB bitstream and send as 112 bits with single address

    MSB First                                                             LSB Last

e.g. row one is sent as 11000111 00001111 ...... 10000011 1111111

                                             0xC7           0x0F             0xBF        0xFF

or does one have to pack the 112 bit bitstream into 7x16bit transfers each with separate address as per the SPI protocol description in Figure 83 of SLOS738E?

I have tried both approaches but I cannot seem to get anything sensible out of the decimator filter when testing either in coeff test mode or injecting sinewaves using the sine test mode. I can see the sinewave and mixer outputs if I bypass the filter, but one enabled ... nothing..

If I use the ADDRESS + 112bit SPI transfer, I note that 0xC6 increments after each transfer, which I assumed is the expected behaviour. However when I try to test either with test mode sine, or test mode coeff (impulse), the with the decimation filter enabled, the output is zero, regardless of test mode.

I can confirm that in all test cases I perform a '1' write to Register 0 bit 2 (SPI_DIG_EN=0) after performing the RAM writes to load RAM.

I'm at a loss as to what to try next.

Is it possible to readback RAM coeff data to verify it has been written properly ? How precisely would this be done ?

Thanks 

Medical Ultrasonograpy SENSOR for LM96530/550/570 family. TX-SDK-V2 Ultrasound TX Evaluation Kit

$
0
0

Hello,

I am looking for a ultrasonography transduder compatible with LM96530/550/570 chips by TI.

In other words this transducer must be compatible with TX-SDK-V2 Ultrasound TX Evaluation Kit

My application requires just one channel instead of 8 channels of above devices. So I am looking for a medical ultraound (ceramic ,I suppose) transducer.

I have been informed that are available  some sensors that have the shape of little parallelepid of about 5x15x16 mm. They shoud be ideal for my application but I cannot find any supplier on the WEB.

I found only circular transducers from some Chinese manufacturer that are not targeted for medical ultrasonograpy (even if simple as mine) applications.

Thak you for your help.

Best regards

Vincenzo

TX SDK V1/V2

$
0
0

What is the difference between TX SDK V1/V2? Is the only difference that one uses the LM96551 and the other one the LM96550? The price difference of these boards is 200$.

The LM96551 offers "floating supply voltages for output stages". What does it mean?

TX-SDK-V2/NOPB

$
0
0

Hello,

I'm working with TX-SDK-V2/NOPB. At the experiment, unfortunately one of the 50 volt out put of the board got short circuit with ground( I was trying to see the output pulse by osiloscope probe, then the probe connected the ground to one of the output channel. I'm not sure if the board damaged or not. Sub voltage didn't go up after that because the constraint current. Can you guide me what should I do now? How can I understand if the board damaged? how can I fix it? Dp you know any places to fix it? 

Thank you

Parisa

Ask for Layout

$
0
0

Hello TI,

I'm working on ultrasound evaluation board by part number of TX-SDK-V2. By the package there is a schematic of power module board but there is no lay out file. The schematic without layout is useless. Is it possible for TI to give me the layout for power module board to get replaced instead of using 11 power supplies.

Regards

Parisa

product

$
0
0

Hello TI,

I'm working on Ultrasound evaluation board. But it damaged through doing some experience. I want to replace main ICs but those are unavailable and out of stock at both digikey and TI website. Could you guide me how can I buy theas ICs.(LM96550, LM 96570, LM96530)

Regards

Parisa


Clock input to CIS sensor from LM98722 AFE's CCD timing generation

$
0
0

Hi,

I am using Contact image sensor in my application, I am using LM98722 AFE to interface CIS sensor, i need help in CCD timing generation in LM98722 for providing clock signals to my CIS sensor..

I need to give 4 MHz clock input and 3.6 KHz clock input to my CIS Sensor, how can this two clock frequencies can be generated from LM98722 AFE CCD timing generation.

Thanks in Advance....

Regards,

Gokuleswaran R

 Design Engineer

XEM3001 to TX-SDK-V2

$
0
0

MY question is, If i am going to program a controller in XEM3001 FPGA, then how to configure the pins in TX-SDK-V2 side? Is there any datasheets are available for tx-sdk-v2 board?

TX-SDK-V2 EVM Power problem at banana connector cable

$
0
0

Sir/Madam,

After I am giving the power supply of +1.8V to 1.8V pin in EVM board, I checked the voltage level in banana cable connector cable pin at TX-SDK-V2 EVM board. It showed +1.4V only. but as per datasheet of LM96570, the digital core voltage should be in the operating ratings between +1.71V to +1.89V. Will it (+1.4) affect the operation of lm96570 IC? also I am not getting the output. 


Thanks, 

TX-SDK-V2 EVM Power problem at +1.8V pin

$
0
0

Sir/Madam

After I am giving the power supply of +1.8V to 1.8V pin in EVM board, I checked the voltage level in banana cable connector pin at TX-SDK-V2 EVM board. It showed +1.4V only but as per datasheet of LM96570, the digital core voltage should be in the operating ratings between +1.71V to +1.89V. Will it (+1.4) affect the operation of lm96570 IC? also I am not getting the output.

Thanks,

TX-SDK-V2 EVB: Wrong power supply Phoenix Connector

$
0
0

Hello,

We recently purchased a TX-SDK-V2 evaluation board, which comes with a Supply Voltage Cable with Phoenix Connector and 12 labeled Banana Plugs. However, the Phoenix Connector on the cable we received is much larger than the one shown in the manual and it does not mate with the PCB connector (photos below).

Would it be possible to get a replacement cable?

Thank you!

Viewing all 5988 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>